| UN Treaty Body | Case name | Number |
|---|
| HRC |
A.A.S. v Denmark, Ballantyne et al v Canada, B.B. v Sweden, Bekzhan et al v Kazakhstan, Billy et al v Australia, Campo Agua’e Indigenous Community v Paraguay, Diergaardt et al v Namibia, H.A. v Denmark, Hebbadj v France, Hopu and Bessert v France, Ignatane v Latvia, Kitok v Sweden, Lansman et al v Finland (I), Lansman et al v Finland (II), Lovelace v Canada, Lubicon Lake Band v Canada, Mahuika et al v New Zealand, Mavlonov and Sa’di v Uzbekistan, Mirzakhodzhaev v Kyrgyzstan, Nesterov et al v Russian Federation, Poma Poma v Peru, Prince v South Africa, Rabbae et al v The Netherlands, Roy v Australia, Sanila-Aikio v Finland, Titiahonjo v Cameroon, Vicente et al v Colombia, Yaker v France, Waldman v Canada |
29 |
| CERD |
Agren et al v Sweden, E.I.F. v The Netherlands, Er v Denmark, Guartambel v Ecuador, Hagan v Australia, Habassi v Denmark, Jewish Community of Oslo v Norway, Koptova v Slovakia, Moylan v Australia, P.S.N. v Denmark, Quereshi v Denmark, TBB-Turkish Union in Berlin/Brandenburg v Germany, U.I. and G.I. v Switzerland, V.S. v Slovakia, Zapescu v Moldova |
15 |
| CESCR |
Djazia and Bellili v Spain, Guerreiro v Spain, IDG v Spain, J.T., J.P.V. and P.M.V et al v Finland, Romero v Spain, Saydawi and Farah v Italy |
6 |
| CEDAW |
A v Denmark, Cepeda et al v Peru, E.S. and S.C. v United Republic of Tanzania, Kell v Canada, Matson et al v Canada, S.B. and M.B. v North Macedonia, Teixeira v Brazil |
7 |
| CAT |
Dimitrijevic v Serbia and Montenegro, Dimitrov v Serbia and Montenegro, H.U. v Finland, L.E.M. v Switzerland, Martinez et al v Mexico, N.R. v Sweden, Osmani v Serbia, Paillalef v Switzerland, S.A.S. v Australia, T.T. v Australia, X and Z v Finland |
11 |
| CRC |
M.E.V., S.E.V. and B.I.V. v Finland, Sacchi et al v Argentina et al |
2 |
| CMW |
|
0 |
| CRPD |
Doolan v Australia, Leo v Australia, X v United Republic of Tanzania, Y v United Republic of Tanzania, Z v United Republic of Tanzania |
5 |
| CED |
|
0 |
| Total |
|
75 |
